GO TO WILSON
INDEX
PART 2
PART 3
PART 4
PART 5
PART 6
The
South and Southern History
by
Clyde Wilson
PART 1
Basic Books
Literature about the South
and Southern history is vast – largely because non-Southerners
have always found the South interesting. The greatest part of
this literature is written from the viewpoint of the outsider
diagnosing sin (in the 19th century) or pathology (since). The
assumption apparently is that any people who don't want to be
like Massachusetts must be either sick or evil.
Some of the
"authorities" who spend their time studying the South
even say, strangely, that it does not exist – it is merely a
delusion created by bigotry and pellagra – though nothing
could be more obvious than that Southerners have a separate
historical experience and culture.
Despite the overwhelming
mass of negative and distorted literature, there are many books,
old and new, that are sympathetic or even-handed and that convey
real knowledge about the region that one good history book
defines as "not quite a nation within the nation, but the
next thing to it."
A
certain number of outsiders, generally morally and
intellectually superior to the critics, have always found the
South interesting and admirable. Remember the vast popularity of
Gone
With the Wind.
That Southerners agreed to
go into a Union with Northerners in 1789 has made them available
for endless attention and correction. If they were politically
separate, Northerners would have no basis for assuming moral and
economic dictatorship over Southerners. It is also true that
much "American" history is actually Southern history.
Southern history that is
well regarded (like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson used
to be) becomes "American," which makes it
non-Southern, which absorbs it into Northern. To most writers
only the "bad" history is "Southern" –
Andrew Jackson is "American," while Nathan Bedford
Forrest, who came out of the same place and culture a generation
later, is "Southern." Works cited are generally in
print or otherwise fairly easily obtainable except those marked
with *. The latter will probably require a very good library or
a serious used book search.
General Works
The best (rather, the only
good) overall history of the Southern region and people is
quoted in the third paragraph above. That book is A
History of the South by Francis Butler Simkins, first
published by Knopf in 1947. It went through many editions, with
suitable revisions by Charles Pierce Roland, until it was
suppressed some time in the 1970s. It is a good place to start
reading Southern history. It sold widely as a textbook and there
are many used copies around.
When
approaching the history of a people, it is good to start with
their particular spirit, which is the most important and the
most continuous thing. For this purpose there is much good
recent or available material:
John Shelton Reed's
straightforward essay on "Southerners" in The
Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, a reference work
that is usually available in larger public libraries. See also
Reed's The
Enduring South.
The best-selling works of
Ronald and Donald Kennedy, The
South Was Right, Why
Not Freedom?, and Was
Jefferson Davis Right?
The works of M.E. Bradford,
any and all. Some will be mentioned later. For the moment: A
Better Guide than Reason, Remembering
Who We Are, and The
Reactionary Imperative.
The
works of Richard M. Weaver, any and all, starting with The
Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver, Ideas
Have Consequences, and Visions
of Order.
The
Creed of the Old South*,
a pair of beautiful essays by Basil L. Gildersleeve. The author
was the greatest American classical scholar and a Confederate
soldier who explained things to fair-minded Northerners after
Reconstruction.
Discussions:
Secular by the
Rev. Robert Lewis Dabney. Dabney was a great theologian and a
close friend of Stonewall Jackson who brilliantly expressed the
Southern viewpoint on many recurrent public issues. The work has
been reprinted by Sprinkle Publications as vol. 4 of Dabney's
works.
Then, the classic by Twelve
Southerners, I'll
Take My Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition.
Less well-known but equally important is its sequel, Who Owns
America?.
See also Regionalism
and Nationalism in the United States (originally titled Attack
on Leviathan) by the Southern poet and essayist Donald
Davidson, and Fifteen Southerners, Why
the South Will Survive*.
The
Encyclopedia of Southern Culture, coedited by Bill Clinton's choice to head the NEH, can be safely
ignored except for subjects having to do with 20th-century
popular culture like "The Beverly Hillbillies."
Another good general
reference that should be in many public libraries is Jay B.
Hubbell, The
South in American Literature.
Let
me call attention to a set of general histories of the United
States from a Southern viewpoint. Waddy Thompson wrote,
beginning in the early 20th century, high-school texts which
went through numerous editions and were widely used in public
schools in the South up until recent decades. These are perfect
for homeschoolers who need a straightforward, honest account of
history. The same can be said for J. Steven Wilkins, America:
The First 350 Years. The magnificent Mises Institute
publications contain much that bears on The War,
"Reconstruction," and Constitutional issues. To wit,
John V. Denson, ed., Costs
of War and Reassessing
the Presidency; and David Gordon, ed., Secession,
State, and Liberty.