Today, the Tennessee Nation blog hosts a guest writer for the first time. Her name is Sara Hill and lives in Alabama.
Chemistry & Physics
My favorite professor in college was a chemistry teacher who wore a big, fat cigar in the corner of his mouth like women wear jewelry. When he lectured, he drove me crazy putting that slobbered-over cigar in his mouth and taking it out again.
But he was so popular and my class so large that I never did make it up to the front of the auditorium after class to have a friendly chat with him about isomers of hydrocarbons before a long line of others with similar intentions had formed. I gave up trying about mid-semester.
But a story he told has stayed with me. Before he became a professor, he was a chemist in research and development for some large corporation. He concocted a product he thought would be a major breakthrough because it totally eliminated household dust.
It had only one problem, he said.
He took the cigar out of his mouth, and with his signature smirk and his eyes dancing over the auditorium, he said, "It was radioactive." Then he clamped his jaw back down over the cigar.
Bet you didn't know there was a physics lesson in chemistry. It's this: for every action to solve a problem, there is an equal and opposite reaction creating a problem that is twice as difficult to solve as the original.
You would think the U.S. government would have caught on to this one by now and left well enough alone!
Thank you Sara! Apparently, no one in the Empire's machinery is as perceptive as you and your chemistry professor.
Documentation of the ineptitude and duplicity of the Empire sometimes comes from the strangest sources. The Daily Show with Jon Stewart could hardly be called a friend of liberty as defined by Southerners, but he does make a telling point with this sketch from his show. Here is a link to the video.
While eight Presidents have tickled the ears of the voting public, they have continued policies which have resulted in exactly the reverse result. They all, both Democrat and Republican alike have forged alliances with BigOil and used the Empire’s military to ensure profits for boys on Wall Street.
Stewart’s last comment is meant to ridicule those who call Obama a communist, but what Stewart really does is point out that the presidency has been occupied by socialists for the last eight administrations.
We need to be free of such. We need a Tennessee Nation.
“Self-sufficiency or individual responsibility is a prerequisite to being free and enjoying the benefits of liberty.” So say Ronald and Donald Kennedy in their new book Nullifying Tyranny.
With the subtitle, Creating Moral Communities in an Immoral Society, the Kennedy brothers return to bookstores with an impassioned plea for Christians to recognize that the principles for a moral and sensible government come from God Himself in the Scripture.
Self-sufficiency they say, “…will produce the following characteristics in an individual: (1) the concept that the individual is solely responsible for his actions, (2) the concept that the individual must accept the consequences for his actions or inactions, and (3) the knowledge that the individual will not be allowed to shift his responsibility to society if he does not take care of his own needs.”
There are legitimate positive results from the application of biblical principles of self-government extending out into the civil realm. When people act in a certain fashion, then specifically defined results can be expected. The problem we face is that politicians (those operate for their own self-interest) already understand that ideas and actions have specific consequences. The Kennedy brothers expound:
Unfortunately, sly politicians know that composed of strong and self-reliant families pose a significant barrier to the envy and greed of politicians and those closely connected to the political ruling elite. Politicians know that people who rely upon themselves and their local community have very little need for a powerful political leader, government bureaucrats, and legions of regulators who promise to provide for the needs of the poor, the ignorant, the downtrodden, or the oppressed masses.
The result is that politicians will enact laws which do not protect the people, their families, and their property, but rather laws which protect the politicians’ interests. The further the distance from the electorate, the more secure the politician is in fulfilling his desires rather than serving “we the people.”
Smaller and more localized government is our only hope.
Just saw this and could not pass on sharing it with y'all.
The notion that governments derive their only just authority from the consent of the governed is a foundational principle of the American experiment. However, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 23% of voters nationwide believe the federal government today has the consent of the governed. Sixty-two percent (62%) say it does not, and 15% are not sure.
In their latest book, Nullifying Tyranny (Pelican Publishing, 2010), the brothers Ronald and Donald Kennedy present a list of principles of government. Their Principle number 8 is, "Elected leaders in a political system of minimum government will be universally acknowledged as statesmen."
The word “statesman” is little used in modern America. More often when it is used it is in fact misused. When the liberal media use the term they mean a successful politician, one who has learned the technique of using OPM (other people’s money) to buy incumbency and assure that he and those close to him reap the benefits available to those who control government—the ruling elite.
This definition is better applied to politicians. Statesmen are the exact opposite of politicians. Politicians tend toward immorality in government and life, whereas statesmen tend toward morality in government and their personal life.
Later the Kennedy brothers ask the question, How can “we the people” establish a system to check the natural tendency of those who control the reins of governmental power from abusing those powers?
The answer is amazingly simple – make sure that the units of governments and the powers of government and the resources of government are so limited that the evil and self-indulgent politician sees no profit in getting involved.
Sluggards (as they are called in Proverbs) do not want to expend to much energy in order to generate their own wealth and/or power. Kissing babies and making stump speeches and eating a number of chicken banquets every two or four (or six) years is enough labour for the sluggard.
The Columbian Empire has become too massive: it collects its revenue by force or threat of force, and when it cannot collect enough, it simply prints more. The Empire reaches into every business and every church and every family with its demands. It is like the flower in the “Little Shop of Horrors.” It’s constant cry is, “FEED ME!”
By every means of nullification, sovereign States must begin to rip the power away from Washington and the politicians who have made a habit of feeding at the public trough. When that fails, we will be forced to secede.
The demagogues of multiculturalism are at it again! On Monday afternoon, the Nashville Scene’s website reported on a law signed by Governor Bredesen. “Were talking about legislation that basically requires anyone who talks or looks like a foreigner to carry documentation proving they’re in this country legally.”
The ACLU’s director Hedy Weinberg referred to the law as “un-American and warned it would lead to racial profiling.”
THE TRUTH?
Monday (28 June 2010), Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen signed into law HB670/SB1141. It reads:
When a person is arrested for any offense and is confined, for any period, in the jail of the county or any municipality, a reasonable effort to review documents in the possession of the prisoner shall be made to assess the citizenship status of the person so confined. If the keeper of the jail or other officer cannot determine the lawful status of the prisoner from the documents in the possession of the prisoner or if it is determined that the person is not lawfully present in the United States, pursuant to the federal Immigration and Naturalization Act…the keeper of the jail or other officer shall notify the United States department of homeland security by facsimile transmission or other appropriate means.
What’s the problem? 1) The person has to have been jailed for breaking a law, and 2) It is the jailer, not any policeman, who has to review any documents.
This is the same procedure which has been in use in both Nashville and Memphis for a couple of years!
I believe I am being more than kind in saying Weinberg is a demagogue—someone who uses the passions or prejudices of the populace for their own interests; an unprincipled popular orator or agitator.
Gov. Bredesen has criticized Arizona’s anti-illegal-immigration legislation, and refused to sign the Tennessee legislature’s resolution “praising Arizona.” He called it “political chest-thumping.” He did the right thing in signing HB670/SB1141. It is limited in its scope and specific in its application.
HB670/SB1141 is a step in the direction of establishing a Free Tennessee.
This December marks one hundred fifty years since South Carolina led the way out of the Union by seceding. Most people (especially politicians) will laugh about the possibility of secession today. We have been taught in government schools and in private and Christian schools as well that we live in “one nation under God, indivisible.” A socialist creed, but not the attitude of the Founding Fathers and certainly never Christian!
In April 1861 Tennessee Governor Isham G. Harris called a special session of the Legislature to respond to Lincoln’s unconstitutional call for troops to invade the States which had legally seceded. On 25 April, he delivered a message which has these lines:
"we are… dissolving our connection with the Federal Union. As established by our fathers, that Union no longer exists. However much we may have cherished it heretofore, no intelligent and candid man can deny that it has ceased to be a blessing, and has become a curse; that it is no longer a high and sacred means of protection, but an engine of oppression; that is has ceased to be a bond of brotherhood, and has become a hateful connection between communities at war."
"The Federal Union of the States, thus practically dissolved, can never be restored; or if ever thus restored, it must, by the very act, cease to be a Union of free and independent States, such as our fathers established. It will become a consolidated, centralized Government, without liberty or equality, in which some will reign and others serve--the few tyrannize, and the many suffer."
Governor Harris correctly understood that should the Yankee North prevail in the coming war, we would no longer have the Union which the Founding Fathers had worked so hard to establish.
As school-children, we are taught to reflect on the Republic and Constitution delivered to us from 1787. As adults, we should recognize that a Union which must be imposed by force is no union at all.
Under Muslim law, a wife is not allowed to leave a marriage. The husband may humiliate her, beat her, and even kill her, but she has no rights. Under Christian law, there are limits to authority in the home, and avenues for escape. Which is that type of government which you will want ruling us in the twenty-first century?
As for me, give me Christianity and a Free Tennessee.
Who allowed the Left to rename Criminal Profiling as Racial Profiling? Replacing the word criminal with racial obviously blurs the intent of the profile and gives the impression that policing agencies are only intending to harass certain racial groups rather than arrest criminals.
A year or two ago, the Left attempted to rename suicide bombers, but the public just didn’t swallow it. The moniker remains. Yet any attempt to apprehend those engaged in illegal activity by developing an easy-to-understand description has become racial profiling because a racial designation is sometimes used.
Policemen are aware that certain actions while driving will indicate that the driver may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol. They are “profiled” and stopped. After a cursory conversation with the driver and possibly a field sobriety test the officer either lets them continue or arrests them for DUI. Profiling just possibly saved the life of someone else on the road. No one complains.
Arizona is being accused of racism because they are utilizing racial profiling. These accusations are supposed to make us cringe in horror at Arizona’s insensitivity. GO ARIZONA!!
It might surprise some to know that the great bulk of illegal immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are Mexicans! WOW! The key word here is illegal! Mexicans can be asked to prove that they are not illegally in the US. If they provide the proper information, they are released. Sounds just like the traffic stop of someone who was perhaps a little sleepy, but not under the influence. GO ARIZONA!!
The only way for a people to have liberty is to live with consistent constitutional government. When the government and its leaders become arbitrary in their enforcement of law, no one is safe...no one is free.
Tennessee needs to join Arizona, so we too can experience the fruit of liberty.